Lehigh Professor: AI Sentiment Shifts Negative in Both Parties Ahead of Midterms

The political stance on artificial intelligence has turned negative in the months leading up to the midterm elections.

Chris Borick, a political science professor at Lehigh University, observed that AI has emerged as a major issue in several recent races. He noted a distinct change in the rhetoric surrounding the technology compared to previous cycles. Historically, voters and politicians viewed technology as a beneficial component of the political economy. Borick stated that this sentiment has flipped over the last year, with many taking a neutral or negative position on AI. He said this shift is occurring in both red and blue states following a public backlash. The change reflects growing concerns about the technology's effects on society, the economy, and local communities.

The approach to the issue differs between the two major parties. Shobita Parthasarathy, a public policy professor at the University of Michigan, said Republican candidates have maintained a close relationship with AI companies for more than a year. Parthasarathy noted that this proximity influences their messaging. She observed that Republican candidates are generally focusing on the cost of the technology. They are less likely to address the broader societal issues or discuss a potential moratorium. This strategy appears designed to limit the scope of the debate.

Borick identified a potential for political realignment at the local level. He explained that conservatives, liberals, Republicans, and Democrats often align in opposition to data centers or express similar concerns about AI. When these groups unite on a specific issue, it creates conditions for shifting political coalitions. Borick suggested that voters may be experiencing these realignments now.

A recent poll of voters in Iowa and Ohio was published online by the outlet SEMAFOR. The survey found that the vast majority of respondents want greater regulation of artificial intelligence. This data point adds to the evidence of changing public attitudes. Candidates are currently making their final pitches to voters with this backdrop of shifting sentiment and party-specific strategies.

The election cycle continues with candidates in Iowa and Ohio facing a electorate that shows strong support for regulatory action. The proximity of the two parties to the industry and the public's desire for oversight will shape the final debates on the topic.